…an intriguing Guest Blog from Romance Author, Catherine La Roche…this LUV business it ain’t so easy, Lads and Lassies… #TBSU…

…the wealth and depth of superb Guest Bloggers to this ol’ Jurassic’s blog continues with Author, Margaret La Roche… here’s a scribe-ess who not only writes excellent romance material, but delves into the ‘Hows’, ‘Whys’ and ‘Wherefores’ of the genre… fascinating post…

…but first, where are yer manners, Master Gallacher?… a wee introduction to the lady is called for…


…Catherine LaRoche is the romance pen name of Catherine Roach, who is a professor of cultural studies and gender studies at the University of Alabama.  Catherine won the Romance Writers of America Academic Research Grant in 2009 and is writing a book on how the story of romance—“find your one true love and live happily ever after”—is the most powerful narrative in popular culture.  A lifelong reader of romance novels, she combines fiction writing of historical romance with academic writing about the romance genre for the best of both worlds.  When not writing, reading, or teaching about romance, she enjoys hiking, cooking for friends, and spending family summers at a lake in her native Canada, where her loon call is known to sometimes fool the local loons.  Her latest Victorian romance ebook KNIGHT OF LOVE was released in June 2014 by Simon & Schuster.
See more at: http://authors.simonandschuster.com/Catherine-LaRoche/407531852.
Click here for a video interview of Catherine by the Popular Romance Project:


…listen, emb’dy who even admits to having a special loon call, is up a notch or five in my estimation already… and she even has the intrepidity to visit my home town, Glasgow, this week… have a wee dram on me, Lassie…slainte math!…

…now, read on to understand how this LUVLY lady is also equipped with more than her fair share of brains…



Catherine LaRoche

I spend a lot of time thinking about romance fiction. My mom reads the books, and I picked up the love of the genre from her when I was a teenager. She always had a tottering pile of novels beside her bed that I’d rummage through for something to borrow. Now I write historical romances and, in my day job, I’m a college professor of gender studies and cultural studies. For the past several years, I’ve included romance fiction in my teaching while I’ve been writing an academic book entitled Happily Ever After: The Romance Story in Popular Culture (forthcoming in mid-2015 from Indiana University Press).

My students choose romances from a big box that I bring into class and write responses on them. We do cut-up exercises with the novels to create alternative storylines. We write a collaborative online romance with scenes ranging from suspense to spicy erotica. I’ve set up a romance lending library in my office; my eight-year old son decorated a poster for borrowers to write down comments about the novels they check out. As I draft my academic book, I workshop chapters with the students in order to get feedback.

I’d like to invite similar feedback from readers here, on some of the book’s conclusions. I propose that romance novels have nine essential elements. (I’m playing off Dr. Pamela Regis’s work in her wonderful 2003 text A Natural History of the Romance Novel.) What do you make of my list so far? Do you agree or disagree? Am I missing anything? All comments welcome!

The nine central claims made by the romance narrative:


  1. It is hard to be alone. We are social animals. Most people need and want love, of some kind. Amid all the possibilities for love as philia (friendship) and agape (spiritual or selfless love), the culture often holds up eros or romantic partner love as an apex of all that love can be and do.
  2. It is a man’s world. Women generally have less power, fewer choices, and suffer from vulnerability and double standards. They often get stuck looking after men or being overlooked by men.
  3. Romance is a religion of love. Romance entails belief in the power of love as a positive orienting force. Love functions as religion, as that which has ultimate meaning in people’s lives.
  4. Romance involves risk. Love doesn’t always work out. Desire can be a source of personal knowledge and power but also of deception and danger. Romance fiction is the safe, imaginative play space to explore the meaning and shape of this landscape.
  5. Romance requires hard work. Baring the true self, making oneself vulnerable to another is hard. Giving up individuality for coupledom requires sacrifice.
  6. Romance facilitates healing. Partner love leads to maturity. Love heals all wounds. Love conquers all.
  7. Romance leads to great sex, especially for women. Women in romance novels are always sexually satisfied. Romance reading can connect women to their sexuality in positive way.
  8. Romance makes you happy. The problematic version of this claim is that you need to be in a romantic relationship for full happiness. Here, romance fiction can be oppressive if it mandates coupledom for everyone.
  9. Romance levels the playing field for women. The heroine always wins. By the end, she is happy, secure, well loved, sexually satisfied, and set up for a fulfilling life. The romance story is a woman-centred fantasy about how to make this man’s world work for her.

…there yeez are now… plenty of food for thought, romantic or otherwise… give the Lady some feedback, thanks a ton, Catherine… see yeez later… LUV YEEZ!…





Filed under Blether, Scribbling & Stuff

9 responses to “…an intriguing Guest Blog from Romance Author, Catherine La Roche…this LUV business it ain’t so easy, Lads and Lassies… #TBSU…

  1. Terrific – if I might add another one to the list! You are never too old for romance, whatever else you might have had to forego as you and your body age disgracefully!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Pingback: Shared Post on Romance Novels | Anne Allen - WriterAnne Allen – Writer

  3. Reblogged this on olbigjim and commented:
    That bloody Scotsman, Seumas Gallacher, introduces us to Catherine Roach, professor of cultural studies and gender studies at the University of Alabama. Give it a read and then look for her latest yarn, KNIGHT OF LOVE.


  4. MM Jaye

    I devoured this post! Being a romance reader and writer myself, I often find myself think about romance (or is it the other way around?). I’m also Greek, so your intro was really not “all Greek” to me!! As for an addition to your essential elements, I’d probably say:

    Romance requires a sense of security: even if we’re dealing with an anti-hero (troubled, physically imperfect, obnoxious) he has to be physically stronger, financially stable and able to protect and provide to his family.

    I read the Wonkomance ladies with great interest (here’s their manifesto: http://wonkomance.com/wonk-o-manifesto/) who are all “Give us Scarlett and Rhett, yes, yes, but can we also have Harold and Maude? Atticus Finch, mmm-hmm, but also Boo Radley? Nick and Nora, absolutely, but also that broody, effed-up Philip Marlowe? We want the whole messy spectrum of human behavior, packaged up for consumption in romance novel form,” but when I read a Ruthie Knox novella where the hero was struggling financially causing family problems, to me, it wasn’t romance, it was a (fantastic, absolutely must read) chick-lit story.

    Thank you for this wonderful post! It goes without saying; I will reblog soon!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.